I am admittedly perturbed that David chose to use part of my article on his blog without giving me any attribution. He told me the next morning that it was well-written but that the "core point" needed to be changed; however, by the time he read it, I had already left for my second job, so he chose to change it himself and post it as his.
In all honesty, the article I posted as my own is slightly different than the one I initially turned in to David. His main critique of my article was that it was too incendiary-- it sounded like I was giving credibility to a terrorist, something he certainly couldn't do on his blog. My original article was indeed more incendiary than the version I have posted (though it wasn't that different). The posted one may still be too sympathetic of Nasrallah. I am in no way validating the terrorist actions of Hezbollah; I do think, however, that my point has merit.
No comments:
Post a Comment